II. Definitions: Event Rate (Event Probability)
- Event Rate: (Number Events) / (Number Total Patients)
- Calculate for both intervention and control groups
III. Definitions: Relative Risk (RR)
- RR = (Intervention Event Rate)/(Control Event Rate)
IV. Definitions: Relative Risk Reduction (RRR)
- Relative Risk Reduction or RRR = 1 - (Relative Risk)
- RRR = (Absolute Risk)/(Control Group Event Probability)
- Proportional decreased risk for the treatment group compared with the control group
- Interpretation requires the actual risk numbers for context
-
Relative Risk and Relative Risk Reduction can be misleading
- Relative Risk Reduction is out of context of the actual values and exaggerates benefit
- In one study of Statins in Hyperlipidemia, coronary disease deaths were measured
- Control group 7.9/100 (0.079)
- Statin group 5.5/100 (0.055)
- Shepherd (1995) N Engl J Med 333:1301-7 [PubMed]
- Benefit to the patient is more easily interpreted with ARR and NNT (but RRR makes headlines)
- Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) = (0.079-0.055)/0.079 = 0.024/0.079 = 30%
- Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) = (0.079-0.055) = 0.024 = 2.4%
- Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 1/0.024 = 42
- Henley (2000) Fam Pract Manag 7(5):59-60 +PMID: 10947349 [PubMed]
- In one study of Statins in Hyperlipidemia, coronary disease deaths were measured
- When applied to an individual patient
- Relative Risk Reduction reflects the effect of an intervention on a population
- Effect is not guaranteed for the individual patient
- Number Needed to Treat (NNT) is a better measure of the chance of a positive effect on the individual
- Relative Risk Reduction is out of context of the actual values and exaggerates benefit
V. Definitions: Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)
- ARR = (Intervention Event Rate) - (Control Event Rate)
- Preferred over Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) since it reflects ACTUAL risk difference
- Refers to the actual difference in risk between the treatment group and the control group
- Result <0 (negative) is seen with effective intervention
- Result >0 (positive) is seen with a harmful intervention (worse than control)
VI. Definitions: Number Needed to Screen (NNS) or Treat (NNT)
- Number of patients screened to prevent one death
- Assumes certain period of time (e.g. one year)
- NNS or NNT = 1/(Absolute Risk Reduction)
- NNT = 100/abs(rateTreatment - rateControl)
- Where Intervention is intended to prevent event X (e.g. Myocardial Infarction)
- Where rateTreatment = Rate of event X in treatment group (e.g. 5%)
- Where rateControl = Rate of event X in a control group (e.g. 10%)
- Example: NNT = 100/(5-10)=-20
- Twenty persons would need to undergo intervention, to prevent one event X
- In this case, the result is negative, consistent with Number Needed to Treat
- If the result were positive, the finding would be consistent with number needed to harm
VII. Resources
- Visual Tool
VIII. References
- Cook (1995) BMJ 310:492-4 [PubMed]
- Daya (1999) Evid Based Obstet Gynecol 1:103-4
- Mcquay (1997) Ann Intern Med 126(9):712-20 [PubMed]